Join thousands of students who trust us to help them ace their exams!Watch the first video
Multiple Choice
How is commensalism different from mutualism in ecological interactions?
A
In commensalism, both species benefit equally, while in mutualism, only one benefits.
B
In commensalism, one species is harmed and the other benefits, while in mutualism, both are harmed.
C
In commensalism, one species benefits while the other is unaffected, whereas in mutualism, both species benefit.
D
In commensalism, both species are harmed, while in mutualism, only one benefits.
Verified step by step guidance
1
Step 1: Define commensalism. Commensalism is an ecological interaction where one species benefits while the other species is neither harmed nor helped (unaffected). This means the unaffected species does not gain or lose anything from the interaction.
Step 2: Define mutualism. Mutualism is an ecological interaction where both species involved benefit from the relationship. This is a positive interaction for both organisms.
Step 3: Compare the two interactions. In commensalism, the relationship is one-sided, with only one species benefiting and the other remaining neutral. In mutualism, both species actively gain benefits from the interaction.
Step 4: Provide examples for clarity. An example of commensalism is barnacles attaching to a whale; the barnacles benefit by gaining mobility and access to food, while the whale is unaffected. An example of mutualism is bees pollinating flowers; the bees gain nectar for food, and the flowers benefit by being pollinated.
Step 5: Summarize the key difference. The key distinction is that commensalism involves one species benefiting and the other being unaffected, whereas mutualism involves both species benefiting from the interaction.