Join thousands of students who trust us to help them ace their exams!Watch the first video
Multiple Choice
Which one of the following is an unintended result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?
A
Establishment of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
B
Requirement for CEOs and CFOs to certify financial statements
C
Increased compliance costs for smaller public companies
D
Enhanced penalties for fraudulent financial activity
Verified step by step guidance
1
Understand the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX): The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in 2002 to improve corporate governance and accountability in response to major corporate scandals. It introduced stricter regulations for public companies, including requirements for financial reporting and internal controls.
Review the intended outcomes of SOX: The Act aimed to enhance transparency, prevent fraud, and restore investor confidence. Key provisions include the establishment of the PCAOB, certification of financial statements by CEOs and CFOs, and enhanced penalties for fraudulent activities.
Identify unintended consequences: While SOX achieved its intended goals, it also led to unintended results, such as increased compliance costs. Smaller public companies, in particular, faced challenges due to the financial burden of implementing the required internal controls and audits.
Analyze the options provided: Evaluate each option to determine whether it aligns with the intended goals of SOX or represents an unintended consequence. For example, the establishment of the PCAOB and certification of financial statements were direct goals of SOX, while increased compliance costs were an unintended result.
Conclude based on analysis: The correct answer is 'Increased compliance costs for smaller public companies,' as this was not an intended goal of SOX but rather a side effect of its implementation.