Join thousands of students who trust us to help them ace their exams!
Multiple Choice
Which one of the following sets of quantum numbers is not possible for an electron in an atom?
A
n = 2, l = 1, m_l = 0, m_s = +1/2
B
n = 3, l = 2, m_l = -2, m_s = -1/2
C
n = 1, l = 1, m_l = 0, m_s = +1/2
D
n = 4, l = 0, m_l = 0, m_s = -1/2
0 Comments
Verified step by step guidance
1
Recall the allowed ranges for each quantum number: the principal quantum number \(n\) must be a positive integer (\(n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots\)), the azimuthal quantum number \(l\) can take integer values from \$0\( up to \)n-1\(, the magnetic quantum number \)m_l\( ranges from \)-l\( to \)+l\( in integer steps, and the spin quantum number \)m_s$ can be either \(+\frac{1}{2}\) or \(-\frac{1}{2}\).
Check the set \(n = 2, l = 1, m_l = 0, m_s = +\frac{1}{2}\): since \(l\) must be less than \(n\), and \$1 < 2\(, this set is possible. Also, \)m_l = 0\( is within \)-1\( to \)+1\(, and \)m_s$ is valid.
Check the set \(n = 3, l = 2, m_l = -2, m_s = -\frac{1}{2}\): here, \(l = 2\) is less than \(n = 3\), \(m_l = -2\) is within \(-2\) to \(+2\), and \(m_s\) is valid, so this set is possible.
Check the set \(n = 1, l = 1, m_l = 0, m_s = +\frac{1}{2}\): since \(l\) must be less than \(n\), but here \(l = 1\) is not less than \(n = 1\), this set violates the rule and is not possible.
Check the set \(n = 4, l = 0, m_l = 0, m_s = -\frac{1}{2}\): \(l = 0\) is less than \(n = 4\), \(m_l = 0\) is valid for \(l = 0\), and \(m_s\) is valid, so this set is possible.