Table of contents

1. Introduction to Genetics51m
2. Mendel's Laws of Inheritance3h 37m
3. Extensions to Mendelian Inheritance2h 41m
4. Genetic Mapping and Linkage2h 28m
5. Genetics of Bacteria and Viruses1h 21m
6. Chromosomal Variation1h 48m
7. DNA and Chromosome Structure56m
8. DNA Replication1h 10m
9. Mitosis and Meiosis1h 34m
10. Transcription1h 0m
11. Translation58m
12. Gene Regulation in Prokaryotes1h 19m
13. Gene Regulation in Eukaryotes44m
14. Genetic Control of Development44m
15. Genomes and Genomics1h 50m
16. Transposable Elements47m
17. Mutation, Repair, and Recombination1h 6m
18. Molecular Genetic Tools19m
- Genetic Cloning
  9m
- Methods for Analyzing DNA
  9m
19. Cancer Genetics29m
- Overview of Cancer
  21m
- Cancer Mutations
  7m
20. Quantitative Genetics1h 26m
21. Population Genetics50m
- Hardy Weinberg
  19m
- Allelic Frequency Changes
  31m
22. Evolutionary Genetics29m

7. DNA and Chromosome Structure

DNA as the Genetic Material

Genetics

7. DNA and Chromosome Structure

DNA as the Genetic Material

Previous problemNext problem

2:04 minutes

Problem 5

Textbook Question

Given the state of knowledge at the time of the Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty experiment, why was it difficult for some scientists to accept that DNA is the carrier of genetic information?

Verified step by step guidance

Understand the historical context: At the time of the Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty experiment (1944), proteins were widely believed to be the carriers of genetic information because they are more chemically diverse and complex than DNA, which was thought to be too simple to encode genetic information.

Review the experiment's findings: Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty demonstrated that DNA, not protein, was the transforming principle in their experiments with Streptococcus pneumoniae. This was a groundbreaking discovery, but it challenged the prevailing scientific dogma.

Consider the skepticism about DNA's structure: DNA was known to be composed of only four nucleotide bases (adenine, thymine, cytosine, and guanine), leading many scientists to believe it lacked the complexity necessary to store genetic information compared to the 20 amino acids in proteins.

Acknowledge the lack of direct evidence: At the time, the molecular structure of DNA (the double helix) had not yet been elucidated by Watson and Crick (1953). Without this structural understanding, it was harder for scientists to visualize how DNA could function as the genetic material.

Recognize the paradigm shift: The acceptance of DNA as the genetic material required a shift in thinking and further experimental evidence, such as the Hershey-Chase experiment (1952), which provided additional support for DNA's role in heredity.

Verified video answer for a similar problem:

This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above

Video duration:

Play a video:

Was this helpful?

Key Concepts

Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.

Historical Context of Genetic Research

In the early 20th century, proteins were widely believed to be the carriers of genetic information due to their complexity and variety. This belief was rooted in the understanding that proteins perform many functions in cells, leading scientists to prioritize them over nucleic acids like DNA, which were thought to be too simple.

Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty Experiment

The 1944 experiment by Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty demonstrated that DNA extracted from pathogenic bacteria could transform non-pathogenic bacteria into pathogenic ones. This pivotal experiment provided strong evidence that DNA is the genetic material, but it faced skepticism because it contradicted the prevailing view that proteins were the primary genetic carriers.

Scientific Skepticism and Paradigm Shifts

Scientific skepticism is a critical part of the scientific process, where new ideas must withstand rigorous scrutiny. The acceptance of DNA as the genetic material required a paradigm shift, which is often met with resistance, especially when established theories are deeply entrenched, as was the case with the protein-centric view of genetics.