Join thousands of students who trust us to help them ace their exams!
Multiple Choice
To ensure that his plans are moving his company in the right direction, Joaquin can apply a:
A
randomized analysis to introduce unpredictability into decision-making
B
positive analysis to objectively evaluate outcomes based on factual evidence
C
subjective analysis to ignore data and rely on intuition
D
normative analysis to focus solely on personal opinions and values
0 Comments
Verified step by step guidance
1
Step 1: Understand the difference between positive and normative analysis in microeconomics. Positive analysis deals with objective, fact-based evaluation of outcomes, while normative analysis involves subjective opinions and value judgments.
Step 2: Recognize that subjective analysis refers to relying on intuition or personal feelings rather than data, which is not suitable for objective decision-making.
Step 3: Note that randomized analysis is a method used in experimental or probabilistic contexts to introduce unpredictability, but it is not the standard approach for evaluating company plans objectively.
Step 4: Identify that Joaquin wants to ensure his plans are moving the company in the right direction by evaluating outcomes based on factual evidence, which aligns with positive analysis.
Step 5: Conclude that applying positive analysis allows Joaquin to objectively assess the effectiveness of his plans using data and factual information, rather than opinions or randomness.