Table of contents
- 1. Intro to Stats and Collecting Data1h 14m
- 2. Describing Data with Tables and Graphs1h 56m
- 3. Describing Data Numerically2h 5m
- 4. Probability2h 17m
- 5. Binomial Distribution & Discrete Random Variables3h 6m
- 6. Normal Distribution and Continuous Random Variables2h 11m
- 7. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Mean3h 23m
- Sampling Distribution of the Sample Mean and Central Limit Theorem19m
- Distribution of Sample Mean - ExcelBonus23m
- Introduction to Confidence Intervals15m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Mean1h 18m
- Determining the Minimum Sample Size Required12m
- Finding Probabilities and T Critical Values - ExcelBonus28m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Means - ExcelBonus25m
- 8. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Proportion2h 10m
- 9. Hypothesis Testing for One Sample5h 8m
- Steps in Hypothesis Testing1h 6m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Means1h 4m
- Hypothesis Testing: Means - ExcelBonus42m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Proportions37m
- Hypothesis Testing: Proportions - ExcelBonus27m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Variance12m
- Critical Values and Rejection Regions28m
- Link Between Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing12m
- Type I & Type II Errors16m
- 10. Hypothesis Testing for Two Samples5h 37m
- Two Proportions1h 13m
- Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus28m
- Two Means - Unknown, Unequal Variance1h 3m
- Two Means - Unknown Variances Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus12m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variance15m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variances Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus9m
- Two Means - Known Variance12m
- Two Means - Sigma Known Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus21m
- Two Means - Matched Pairs (Dependent Samples)42m
- Matched Pairs Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus12m
- Two Variances and F Distribution29m
- Two Variances - Graphing CalculatorBonus16m
- 11. Correlation1h 24m
- 12. Regression3h 33m
- Linear Regression & Least Squares Method26m
- Residuals12m
- Coefficient of Determination12m
- Regression Line Equation and Coefficient of Determination - ExcelBonus8m
- Finding Residuals and Creating Residual Plots - ExcelBonus11m
- Inferences for Slope31m
- Enabling Data Analysis ToolpakBonus1m
- Regression Readout of the Data Analysis Toolpak - ExcelBonus21m
- Prediction Intervals13m
- Prediction Intervals - ExcelBonus19m
- Multiple Regression - ExcelBonus29m
- Quadratic Regression15m
- Quadratic Regression - ExcelBonus10m
- 13. Chi-Square Tests & Goodness of Fit2h 21m
- 14. ANOVA2h 29m
11. Correlation
Correlation Coefficient
Problem 10.1.5
Textbook Question
Interpreting r
In Exercises 5–8, use a significance level of α = 0.05 and refer to the accompanying displays.
Bear Weight and Chest Size Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in Data Set 18 “Bear Measurements” in Appendix B; results are shown in the accompanying Statdisk display. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight?

Verified step by step guidance1
Step 1: Understand the problem. We are tasked with determining if there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between bear weights and chest sizes. Additionally, we need to assess if chest size can be used to predict weight.
Step 2: Identify the given data. From the image, the correlation coefficient (r) is 0.963141, the critical r value is ±0.2680855, and the p-value (two-tailed) is 0.000. The significance level (α) is 0.05.
Step 3: Compare the correlation coefficient (r) to the critical r value. If the absolute value of r is greater than the critical r, then there is evidence of a significant linear correlation.
Step 4: Evaluate the p-value. If the p-value is less than the significance level (α = 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant linear correlation.
Step 5: Interpret the results. If there is a significant linear correlation, consider whether chest size is easier to measure than weight and if it can be used as a predictor for weight. This involves practical reasoning based on the context of the problem.
Verified video answer for a similar problem:This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above
Video duration:
2mPlay a video:
0 Comments
Key Concepts
Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.
Correlation Coefficient (r)
The correlation coefficient, denoted as 'r', quantifies the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. Values range from -1 to 1, where 1 indicates a perfect positive correlation, -1 a perfect negative correlation, and 0 no correlation. In this case, an r value of 0.963 suggests a very strong positive correlation between bear weights and chest sizes.
Recommended video:
Guided course
Correlation Coefficient
P-value
The p-value measures the probability of obtaining results at least as extreme as the observed results, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A p-value of 0.000 indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that the observed correlation is statistically significant. In this context, it implies that there is a significant linear correlation between the weights and chest sizes of bears.
Recommended video:
Guided course
Step 3: Get P-Value
Significance Level (α)
The significance level, often denoted as α, is the threshold for determining whether a p-value indicates a statistically significant result. In this scenario, α is set at 0.05, meaning that if the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis can be rejected. Given the p-value of 0.000, the results are significant, supporting the claim of a linear correlation between the two measured variables.
Recommended video:
Guided course
Step 4: State Conclusion Example 4
Related Videos
Related Practice
Multiple Choice
In statistics, which value represents the strongest possible linear correlation coefficient?
13
views
