Join thousands of students who trust us to help them ace their exams!Watch the first video
Multiple Choice
Based on the data, what can be concluded about the relationship between chytrid fungus and the decline in frog populations?
A
The data conclusively prove that chytrid fungus is the sole cause of the decline in frog populations.
B
The data show a correlation between the presence of chytrid fungus and the drop in frog numbers, but do not prove causation.
C
The data indicate that there is no relationship between chytrid fungus and frog population decline.
D
The data suggest that frog populations increased in the presence of chytrid fungus.
Verified step by step guidance
1
Understand the concept of correlation versus causation: Correlation means that two variables are related, but it does not necessarily mean that one causes the other. Causation implies a direct cause-and-effect relationship.
Examine the data provided: Look for patterns or trends that show the presence of chytrid fungus alongside changes in frog populations. Determine if the data show a consistent relationship between these two variables.
Evaluate the evidence for causation: Check if the data include controlled experiments or other evidence that directly links chytrid fungus as the sole cause of frog population decline. If not, causation cannot be conclusively proven.
Consider alternative explanations: Explore whether other factors, such as habitat loss, climate change, or pollution, could also contribute to the decline in frog populations alongside chytrid fungus.
Draw a conclusion based on the data: If the data show a consistent presence of chytrid fungus with declining frog populations but lack direct evidence of causation, the conclusion should focus on correlation rather than causation.