Join thousands of students who trust us to help them ace their exams!Watch the first video
Multiple Choice
Which of the following conclusions are consistent with the eocyte hypothesis?
A
Eukaryotes and Archaea are entirely separate domains with no shared ancestry.
B
Eukaryotes evolved directly from Bacteria.
C
Eukaryotes evolved from within a group of Archaea known as eocytes (Crenarchaeota).
D
All prokaryotes are more closely related to each other than to eukaryotes.
Verified step by step guidance
1
Understand the eocyte hypothesis: The eocyte hypothesis proposes that eukaryotes evolved from within a specific group of Archaea called eocytes (Crenarchaeota), rather than being entirely separate from Archaea or evolving directly from Bacteria.
Analyze the first statement: 'Eukaryotes and Archaea are entirely separate domains with no shared ancestry.' This is inconsistent with the eocyte hypothesis because the hypothesis suggests a shared ancestry between eukaryotes and eocytes (a subgroup of Archaea).
Analyze the second statement: 'Eukaryotes evolved directly from Bacteria.' This is also inconsistent with the eocyte hypothesis, as it states that eukaryotes evolved from within Archaea, not directly from Bacteria.
Analyze the third statement: 'Eukaryotes evolved from within a group of Archaea known as eocytes (Crenarchaeota).' This is consistent with the eocyte hypothesis, as it aligns with the idea that eukaryotes originated from eocytes.
Analyze the fourth statement: 'All prokaryotes are more closely related to each other than to eukaryotes.' This is inconsistent with the eocyte hypothesis because it suggests that Archaea (a type of prokaryote) are more closely related to eukaryotes than to Bacteria, contradicting the idea that all prokaryotes are equally related.