How do you calculate the pooled proportion in a two proportions hypothesis test using Excel?

The pooled proportion p ¯ is calculated by combining the successes and sample sizes from both groups. In Excel, you add the number of successes from both samples (x 1 + x 2 ) and divide by the total sample size (n 1 + n 2 ). The formula looks like this: = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2) . This pooled proportion is used in the denominator of the z-score formula to estimate the common proportion under the null hypothesis.

What are the steps to calculate the z-score for two population proportions manually in Excel?

To calculate the z-score manually in Excel for two population proportions, follow these steps: 1) Calculate the sample proportions p ^ 1 and p ^ 2 by dividing successes by sample sizes. 2) Compute the pooled proportion p ¯ as = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2) . 3) Calculate q ¯ as = 1 - p_bar . 4) Find the numerator: = p1_hat - p2_hat . 5) Calculate the denominator as the square root of p_bar ⋅ q_bar n + p_bar ⋅ q_bar n using Excel's =SQRT() function. 6) Finally, compute the z-score as numerator divided by denominator. This stepwise approach reduces errors and makes the process manageable.

10. Hypothesis Testing for Two Samples

Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel

10. Hypothesis Testing for Two Samples

Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel: Videos & Practice Problems

Video Lessons Practice

Topic summary

Performing a hypothesis test for two population proportions involves defining the null hypothesis $H 0 : p 1 = p 2$ and alternative hypothesis $H a : p 1 < p 2$ . Calculate sample proportions $p_{^1} = \frac{x}{n}$ and $p_{^2} = \frac{x}{n}$ , then compute the pooled proportion $p = \frac{x 1 + x 2}{n 1 + n 2}$ . The test statistic z-score is calculated as $\frac{p_{^1} - p_{^2}}{\sqrt{p (1 - p) \frac{1}{n_{1}} + p (1 - p) \frac{1}{n_{2}}}}$ . Using the z-score, find the p-value with the standard normal distribution. If the p-value exceeds the alpha level (e.g., 0.05), fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating insufficient evidence to support the alternative claim. This method integrates key concepts like sample statistics, pooled proportion, and significance testing essential for analyzing categorical data in business analytics and experimental design.

Downloads & Resources

concept

Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel

Video duration:

Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel Video Summary

Performing a hypothesis test for two population proportions in Excel involves following a structured process similar to manual calculations, but Excel streamlines the arithmetic and statistical functions. Consider a scenario where a coffee shop suspects that the proportion of customers ordering muffins is lower on weekdays compared to weekends. To test this claim at a significance level of α = 0.05, we start by defining the null hypothesis (H₀) as the equality of the two population proportions, p₁ = p₂, where p₁ represents the weekday proportion and p₂ the weekend proportion. The alternative hypothesis (Hₐ) reflects the claim that the weekday proportion is less than the weekend proportion, p₁ < p₂.

Next, we calculate the test statistic using the z-score formula for two proportions:

\[z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\bar{p} \bar{q} \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)}}\]

Here, 𝑛₁ and 𝑛₂ are the sample sizes for weekdays and weekends, respectively; 𝑥₁ and 𝑥₂ are the counts of muffin orders in each sample; \hat{p}_1 = \frac{x_1}{n_1} and \hat{p}_2 = \frac{x_2}{n_2} are the sample proportions; and \bar{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} is the pooled proportion with \bar{q} = 1 - \bar{p}.

In Excel, the COUNTIF function efficiently counts the number of "yes" responses indicating muffin orders in each sample, providing values for x₁ and x₂. Sample sizes n₁ and n₂ are determined by counting the total orders in each group. Calculating the sample proportions and pooled proportion involves straightforward division formulas referencing these counts.

Breaking down the z-score formula into components simplifies the process: first compute the numerator (\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2), then calculate the denominator's square root term by summing the fractions \frac{\bar{p} \bar{q}}{n_1} and \frac{\bar{p} \bar{q}}{n_2}. Excel’s SQRT function handles the square root, ensuring accuracy and clarity.

Once the z-score is obtained, converting it to a p-value depends on the direction of the alternative hypothesis. For a left-tailed test, the p-value corresponds to the cumulative probability to the left of the z-score, which Excel calculates using the NORM.S.DIST(z, TRUE) function. Comparing the p-value to the significance level α determines the test outcome: if the p-value exceeds α, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating insufficient evidence to support the claim that the weekday proportion is less than the weekend proportion.

This methodical approach in Excel not only reinforces understanding of hypothesis testing for two population proportions but also leverages computational tools to minimize errors and enhance efficiency. Mastery of these steps enables confident analysis of proportion differences in various practical contexts.

Study Smarter with Worksheets.

Follow along with each video using our printable worksheets

example

Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel Example 1

Video duration:

Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel Example 1 Video Summary

When comparing proportions between two independent groups, such as middle school and high school students scoring "exceeding expectations" (e) on a state exam, hypothesis testing helps determine if there is a significant difference. The null hypothesis ($H_0$) assumes the proportions are equal, expressed as $p_1 = p_2$, where $p_1$ is the proportion of middle school students scoring an "e" and $p_2$ is the proportion for high school students. The alternative hypothesis ($H_a$) reflects the claim being tested—in this case, that the proportion for middle school students is greater than that for high school students, or $p_1 > p_2$.

To conduct the test, sample data is collected from both groups, with sample sizes $n_1$ and $n_2$ (both 50 in this example). The number of successes (students scoring "e") in each sample is denoted as $x_1$ and $x_2$. Sample proportions ($\hat{p}_1$ and $\hat{p}_2$) are calculated by dividing the number of successes by the sample size:

\[\hat{p}_1 = \frac{x_1}{n_1}, \quad \hat{p}_2 = \frac{x_2}{n_2}\]

Next, the pooled sample proportion ($\bar{p}$) combines successes and sample sizes from both groups to estimate the common proportion under the null hypothesis:

\[\bar{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2}\]

Its complement, $\bar{q}$, is calculated as:

\[\bar{q} = 1 - \bar{p}\]

The test statistic for comparing two proportions is a z-score, which measures how many standard errors the observed difference in sample proportions is from zero. The formula for the z-score is:

\[z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\bar{p} \bar{q} \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)}}\]

This formula accounts for the variability in both samples and uses the pooled proportion to estimate the standard error. After calculating the z-score, the p-value is found to determine the probability of observing such a difference (or more extreme) if the null hypothesis is true. Since the alternative hypothesis is one-sided ($p_1 > p_2$), the p-value corresponds to the right tail of the standard normal distribution:

\[p\text{-value} = 1 - \Phi(z)\]

where $\Phi(z)$ is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution.

Comparing the p-value to the significance level $\alpha$ (0.1 in this case) guides the decision. If the p-value is less than $\alpha$, the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating sufficient evidence that the proportion of middle school students scoring "e" is higher. If the p-value is greater, as in this example (approximately 0.33), the null hypothesis is not rejected, meaning there is insufficient evidence to support the claim.

This process illustrates the importance of formulating clear hypotheses, calculating sample proportions, using pooled estimates for standard error, and interpreting p-values within the context of hypothesis testing for proportions. Understanding these steps enables accurate conclusions about differences between groups based on sample data.

example

Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel Example 2

Video duration:

10m

Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel Example 2 Video Summary

When comparing the proportions of senior varsity athletes between two high schools, a two-proportion hypothesis test can determine if the proportions differ significantly. The null hypothesis assumes that the proportions are equal, expressed as $H_0: p_1 = p_2$, where $p_1$ and $p_2$ represent the proportions of senior varsity athletes at School A and School B, respectively. The alternative hypothesis, reflecting the possibility of a difference without direction, is $H_a: p_1 \neq p_2$.

To conduct this test, data is collected from random samples of 50 varsity athletes from each school, recording the number of seniors in each group. The sample proportions $\hat{p}_1$ and $\hat{p}_2$ are calculated by dividing the number of seniors by the total sample size for each school. For example, if School A has 19 seniors out of 50 athletes, then $\hat{p}_1 = \frac{19}{50} = 0.38$, and if School B has 32 seniors, then $\hat{p}_2 = \frac{32}{50} = 0.64$.

Next, the pooled proportion $\bar{p}$ is computed to combine the successes from both samples, using the formula:

\[\bar{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2}\]

where $x_1$ and $x_2$ are the counts of seniors in each sample, and $n_1$ and $n_2$ are the respective sample sizes. The complement $q$ is then calculated as $q = 1 - \bar{p}$.

The test statistic $z$ is calculated using the formula for two proportions:

\[z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{\sqrt{\bar{p} \cdot q \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)}}\]

This formula measures how many standard errors the observed difference in sample proportions is away from the hypothesized difference of zero under the null hypothesis.

After calculating the $z$-score, the corresponding two-tailed p-value is found by determining the probability of observing a value as extreme or more extreme than the test statistic in either tail of the standard normal distribution. This is done by finding the cumulative probability for the smaller tail (based on the sign of $z$) and doubling it.

For instance, a $z$-score of approximately -2.6 yields a p-value around 0.009. Comparing this p-value to the significance level $\alpha = 0.01$, since \$0.009 < 0.01$, the null hypothesis is rejected. This indicates sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportions of senior varsity athletes differ between the two schools.

Understanding this process is essential for analyzing categorical data across groups, applying hypothesis testing principles, and interpreting statistical results to make informed decisions about population proportions.

Do you want more practice?

We have more practice problems on Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - Excel

Here’s what students ask on this topic:

To perform a hypothesis test for two population proportions in Excel, you first define your null hypothesis $H 0 : p 1 = p 2$ and alternative hypothesis, for example, $H a : p 1 < p 2$ . Next, calculate the sample proportions $\hat{p} 1$ and $\hat{p} 2$ by dividing the number of successes by the sample sizes. Then find the pooled proportion $\bar{p}$ by summing successes and dividing by total sample size. Use the z-score formula $z = \frac{\hat{p} 1 - \hat{p} 2}{\sqrt{\frac{\bar{p} \cdot 1 - \bar{p}}{n_{1}} + \frac{\bar{p} \cdot 1 - \bar{p}}{n_{2}}}}$ . Finally, convert the z-score to a p-value using Excel's NORM.S.DIST function and compare it to your significance level (alpha) to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.

In Excel, the COUNTIF function is very useful for counting the number of successes (e.g., orders with muffins) in each sample. For example, =COUNTIF(range, "yes") counts how many cells in the specified range contain "yes". To calculate the p-value from the z-score, use the =NORM.S.DIST(z, TRUE) function, which returns the cumulative probability for the standard normal distribution. This helps convert the z-score into a p-value for hypothesis testing. These functions simplify the calculations and reduce errors compared to manual computation.

The pooled proportion $\bar{p}$ is calculated by combining the successes and sample sizes from both groups. In Excel, you add the number of successes from both samples (x₁ + x₂) and divide by the total sample size (n₁ + n₂). The formula looks like this: = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2). This pooled proportion is used in the denominator of the z-score formula to estimate the common proportion under the null hypothesis.

After calculating the p-value in Excel, compare it to your chosen significance level (alpha), often 0.05. If the p-value is less than alpha, you reject the null hypothesis, indicating sufficient evidence that the population proportions differ as stated in the alternative hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than alpha, you fail to reject the null hypothesis, meaning there is not enough evidence to support the alternative claim. For example, a p-value of 0.34 > 0.05 means you fail to reject the null hypothesis, so you conclude the proportions are not significantly different.

To calculate the z-score manually in Excel for two population proportions, follow these steps: 1) Calculate the sample proportions $\hat{p} 1$ and $\hat{p} 2$ by dividing successes by sample sizes. 2) Compute the pooled proportion $\bar{p}$ as = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2). 3) Calculate $\bar{q}$ as = 1 - p_bar. 4) Find the numerator: = p1_hat - p2_hat. 5) Calculate the denominator as the square root of $\frac{p_bar ⋅ q_bar}{n} + \frac{p_bar ⋅ q_bar}{n}$ using Excel's =SQRT() function. 6) Finally, compute the z-score as numerator divided by denominator. This stepwise approach reduces errors and makes the process manageable.