Skip to main content
Back

Ch. 14 Study Guide

Study Guide - Smart Notes

Tailored notes based on your materials, expanded with key definitions, examples, and context.

Q1. What is an oligopoly?

Background

Topic: Market Structures

This question tests your understanding of different market structures, specifically oligopoly, and how it compares to other types like monopoly and perfect competition.

Key Terms:

  • Oligopoly: A market structure where a small number of firms dominate the market and are interdependent in their decision-making.

  • Monopoly: A market with only one supplier.

  • Perfect Competition: Many sellers offering identical products.

  • Monopsony: Only one buyer in a factor market.

  • Differentiated Products: Products that are not identical and can be distinguished from each other.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Review the definitions of each market structure listed in the answer choices.

  2. Focus on the characteristics of oligopoly: few firms, interdependence, and potential for strategic behavior.

  3. Compare these characteristics to the other options to identify which best describes an oligopoly.

  4. Think about real-world examples where a few firms dominate an industry and interact strategically.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: A. where a small number of interdependent firms compete.

This is the textbook definition of an oligopoly. The other options describe different market structures.

Q2. Three examples of oligopolies in the United States are industries that produce or sell:

Background

Topic: Real-World Oligopoly Examples

This question tests your ability to identify industries in the U.S. that are oligopolistic, meaning they are dominated by a few large firms.

Key Terms:

  • Oligopoly: Few firms dominate the market.

  • Industry Examples: Look for industries with high concentration ratios.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Recall industries where a few firms control most of the market share (e.g., technology, tobacco, breakfast cereal).

  2. Eliminate options that include industries with many small firms or low barriers to entry.

  3. Focus on industries with high concentration ratios and strategic interactions among firms.

  4. Think about the market share and competition in each industry listed in the answer choices.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: D. computers, athletic footwear, and cigarettes.

These industries are classic examples of oligopolies in the U.S., dominated by a few major firms.

Q3. What are economies of scale?

Background

Topic: Cost Structures and Firm Growth

This question tests your understanding of how a firm's average costs change as output increases, and the implications for competition.

Key Terms and Formula:

  • Economies of Scale: When long-run average costs decrease as output increases.

  • Long-Run Average Cost (LRAC):

  • TC = Total Cost, Q = Quantity of Output

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Review the definition of economies of scale and how it relates to the LRAC curve.

  2. Consider how economies of scale can give a firm a cost advantage over competitors.

  3. Think about the implications for pricing and profitability if a firm achieves economies of scale before others.

  4. Apply this concept to the restaurant industry and consider whether economies of scale are significant.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: D. A situation in which a firm's long-run average costs fall as the firm increases output.

Economies of scale occur when increasing production lowers average costs in the long run.

Q4. What does the columnist mean by "barriers to entry"?

Background

Topic: Barriers to Entry and Market Power

This question tests your understanding of what prevents new firms from entering profitable industries, and how this affects competition.

Key Terms:

  • Barriers to Entry: Factors that make it difficult for new firms to enter an industry.

  • Examples: Economies of scale, network effects, access to technology, brand loyalty.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Review the definition of barriers to entry and how they protect incumbent firms.

  2. Consider examples of barriers in tech industries (e.g., Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon).

  3. Think about how technological changes might lower these barriers and increase competition.

  4. Identify which answer choices best capture the concept of barriers to entry.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: D. Anything that keeps new firms from entering an industry in which firms are earning economic profits.

Barriers to entry prevent new competitors from entering profitable markets.

Q5. Under which conditions would you expect to see the market composed of firms like LittleAuto or dominated by firms like BigAuto?

Background

Topic: Economies of Scale and Market Structure

This question tests your understanding of how market demand and economies of scale influence the types of firms that dominate an industry.

Key Terms:

  • Economies of Scale: Lower average costs at higher output levels.

  • Market Demand: Total quantity demanded at various price levels.

  • Average Total Cost (ATC):

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Examine how the intersection of the market demand curve with the quantity axis affects which firms can operate efficiently.

  2. Consider the cost structures of LittleAuto and BigAuto and how economies of scale impact their competitiveness.

  3. Think about the implications for market structure when demand is low versus high.

  4. Match the conditions to the types of firms that would be most efficient under each scenario.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: Firms like LittleAuto dominate when demand is low; firms like BigAuto dominate when demand is high.

Economies of scale favor larger firms when market demand is sufficient to support their lower average costs.

Q6. What level of concentration indicates that an industry is an oligopoly?

Background

Topic: Concentration Ratios and Market Structure

This question tests your understanding of how economists measure the extent of competition in an industry using concentration ratios.

Key Terms:

  • Four-Firm Concentration Ratio: Percentage of market share held by the four largest firms.

  • Oligopoly: High concentration ratio, few firms dominate.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Recall the threshold concentration ratio commonly used to identify oligopolies.

  2. Consider why a high concentration ratio indicates limited competition.

  3. Think about the limitations of concentration ratios in measuring competition.

  4. Review the answer choices for accuracy and flaws in the concentration ratio measure.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: Greater than 40 percent.

A four-firm concentration ratio above 40% is typically considered indicative of an oligopoly.

Q7. Show how economies of scale in discount department stores can lead to an oligopolistic market by comparing long-run average cost curves.

Background

Topic: Economies of Scale and Market Structure

This question tests your ability to illustrate how economies of scale can lead to fewer firms dominating a market.

Key Terms and Formula:

  • Long-Run Average Cost (LRAC):

  • Competitive Market: Many firms, less economies of scale.

  • Oligopolistic Market: Few firms, significant economies of scale.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Draw the LRAC curve for a typical firm in a competitive market (LRAC1), showing less pronounced economies of scale.

  2. Draw the LRAC curve for a typical firm in an oligopolistic market (LRAC2), showing significant economies of scale.

  3. Compare the shapes of the curves and explain how lower average costs at higher output levels favor larger firms.

  4. Discuss how this leads to fewer firms dominating the market.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: LRAC2 shows lower average costs at higher output, leading to oligopoly.

Economies of scale allow a few firms to dominate by achieving lower costs than smaller competitors.

Q8. What is the difference between explicit collusion and implicit collusion?

Background

Topic: Collusion and Market Behavior

This question tests your understanding of how firms may cooperate to restrict competition, either overtly or subtly.

Key Terms:

  • Explicit Collusion: Direct agreement among firms to restrict competition.

  • Implicit Collusion: Firms signal or follow each other's behavior without direct agreement.

  • Cartel: Group of firms colluding to restrict output and increase prices.

  • Price Leadership: One firm sets price, others follow.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Review the definitions of explicit and implicit collusion.

  2. Consider examples of each type of collusion.

  3. Think about the legality and detection of collusion.

  4. Match the examples to the correct type of collusion.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: Explicit collusion is direct agreement; implicit collusion is signaling or following without agreement.

Explicit collusion is illegal, while implicit collusion is harder to detect and may involve price leadership.

Q9. Use the information to complete the matrix for the prisoner's dilemma scenario with Bob and Tom.

Background

Topic: Game Theory and Prisoner's Dilemma

This question tests your ability to analyze strategic interactions and dominant strategies in a classic game theory scenario.

Key Terms and Matrix:

  • Prisoner's Dilemma: A situation where two players may not cooperate even if it is in their best interest.

  • Dominant Strategy: A strategy that is best regardless of what the other player does.

  • Payoff Matrix: Table showing outcomes for each combination of strategies.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Fill in the matrix with the sentences for each combination of confess/don't confess.

  2. Identify if either player has a dominant strategy by comparing outcomes.

  3. Analyze the Nash equilibrium for the game.

  4. Consider the implications for both players' decisions.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: Both have a dominant strategy to confess; Nash equilibrium is both confessing.

Confessing is the dominant strategy for both, leading to a suboptimal outcome for each.

Q10. Can game theory help analyze the situation with early decision college admission plans?

Background

Topic: Game Theory and Strategic Decision-Making

This question tests your understanding of how game theory applies to real-world situations where decisions depend on others' actions.

Key Terms:

  • Game Theory: Study of strategic interactions.

  • Prisoner's Dilemma: Situation where individual rationality leads to collective suboptimal outcomes.

  • Cooperative Equilibrium: Players cooperate for mutual benefit.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Identify the strategic interaction among colleges regarding early decision plans.

  2. Consider how game theory models the incentives and outcomes.

  3. Determine which game theory concept best fits the scenario.

  4. Review the answer choices for the most appropriate game theory model.

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: C. The prisoner's dilemma.

Colleges face a prisoner's dilemma, where individual incentives lead to widespread use of early decision plans.

Q11. Is there a Nash equilibrium in the advertising game between Coca-Cola and Pepsi?

Background

Topic: Nash Equilibrium in Oligopoly

This question tests your ability to identify Nash equilibrium in a payoff matrix for competing firms.

Key Terms and Formula:

  • Nash Equilibrium: Situation where no player can improve their outcome by changing their strategy unilaterally.

  • Payoff Matrix: Table showing profits for each combination of strategies.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Examine the payoff matrix for Coca-Cola and Pepsi.

  2. Identify the strategies where neither firm can improve their profit by changing their decision alone.

  3. Compare the profits for each combination of advertising/not advertising.

  4. Determine which combination is the Nash equilibrium.

Coca-Cola and Pepsi advertising payoff matrix

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: There is only a Nash equilibrium in which both firms advertise.

Both firms advertising is the Nash equilibrium because neither can improve their profit by changing their strategy alone.

Q12. What is the cooperative equilibrium and Nash equilibrium for the oil market game between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait?

Background

Topic: Game Theory, Cartels, and Nash Equilibrium

This question tests your understanding of cooperative and non-cooperative equilibria in oligopoly settings.

Key Terms:

  • Cooperative Equilibrium: Players cooperate to maximize joint payoffs.

  • Nash Equilibrium: No player can improve their outcome by changing their strategy alone.

  • Cartel: Firms collude to restrict output and increase profits.

  • Payoff Matrix: Table showing profits for each combination of strategies.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Examine the payoff matrix for Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

  2. Identify the combination of strategies that maximizes joint profits (cooperative equilibrium).

  3. Determine the Nash equilibrium by checking if either country can improve their profit by changing output alone.

  4. Compare the cooperative and Nash equilibria.

Saudi Arabia and Kuwait oil market payoff matrix

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: Cooperative equilibrium is both producing low output; Nash equilibrium is both producing high output.

Collusion leads to higher joint profits, but Nash equilibrium may not be cooperative.

Q13. What effect will price matching have on profits for HP and Dell relative to the Nash equilibrium?

Background

Topic: Price Matching and Oligopoly Profits

This question tests your understanding of how price matching strategies affect profits in an oligopoly.

Key Terms:

  • Price Matching: Firms commit to matching competitors' prices.

  • Nash Equilibrium: No firm can improve profit by changing strategy alone.

  • Payoff Matrix: Table showing profits for each combination of strategies.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Examine the payoff matrix for HP and Dell.

  2. Identify the Nash equilibrium without price matching.

  3. Analyze how price matching changes the strategies and profits.

  4. Calculate the change in profits for each firm.

HP and Dell printer market payoff matrix

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: HP's profit increases by $50; Dell's profit increases by $50.

Price matching allows both firms to coordinate and earn higher profits than in the Nash equilibrium.

Q14. What is the cooperative equilibrium for the breakfast cereal market game between Kellogg and Post?

Background

Topic: Cooperative Equilibrium in Oligopoly

This question tests your understanding of how firms can cooperate to maximize joint profits in a duopoly.

Key Terms:

  • Cooperative Equilibrium: Both firms choose strategies that maximize joint profits.

  • Nash Equilibrium: No firm can improve profit by changing strategy alone.

  • Payoff Matrix: Table showing profits for each combination of strategies.

Step-by-Step Guidance

  1. Examine the payoff matrix for Kellogg and Post.

  2. Identify the combination of prices that maximizes joint profits (cooperative equilibrium).

  3. Determine if the cooperative equilibrium is likely to occur based on dominant strategies.

  4. Compare cooperative and Nash equilibria.

Kellogg and Post breakfast cereal market payoff matrix

Try solving on your own before revealing the answer!

Final Answer: Cooperative equilibrium is both charging $4.00; unlikely to occur because it is not a dominant strategy.

Cooperation maximizes profits, but dominant strategies may lead to lower prices.

Pearson Logo

Study Prep