BackRELG 2: Defining secularism
Study Guide - Smart Notes
Tailored notes based on your materials, expanded with key definitions, examples, and context.
Secularism, Religion & Human Rights
Introduction
This study guide explores the concept of secularism, its relationship to religion and human rights, and the specific debates surrounding secularism in Quebec. The philosophical contributions of Charles Taylor are central to understanding these issues, especially his distinction between open and closed secularism and their implications for liberal democracy.
Charles Taylor’s Approach to Secularism
Philosophical Foundations
Secularism is the political principle that separates religion from the state to ensure freedom of conscience and equal treatment of all citizens.
Charles Taylor argues that secularism is not simply about excluding religion from public life, but about managing religious and philosophical diversity fairly and democratically.
He emphasizes autonomy—the inner freedom to choose one's principles and the outer freedom to shape one's destiny—as essential achievements of human nature.
Key Principles of Liberal Democracy (Taylor):
Moral equality of persons
Freedom of conscience and religion
Separation of church and state
Example: Taylor critiques policies that disadvantage religious minorities, such as refusing public subsidies for denominational schools, arguing that true secularism should ensure equality between options and not devalue individual autonomy.
Quebec Debates on Secularism
Historical Context and Key Events
Quebec has experienced significant debates over secularism, shaped by its unique history and cultural context. The following timeline highlights major events:
Event | Description |
|---|---|
Quebec’s Quiet Revolution | Breaks with the clerical nationalism of the Duplessis era |
Quebec Charter of Human Rights | Modeled on the UDHR; guarantees religious freedom |
Bouchard–Taylor Commission | Promotes open secularism and accommodation |
Charter of Values (failed) | Proposed religious symbols ban |
Bill 21 | Bans religious symbols for public employees |
2025 Quebec Secularism Report (Pechat-Rousseau Report) | Expands bans, restricts accommodations |
Example: The Bouchard–Taylor Commission advocated for open secularism, while Bill 21 and the 2025 report represent a move toward closed secularism by restricting religious expression in public institutions.
Open vs. Closed Secularism
Definitions and Comparison
Open Secularism: The state remains neutral, but individuals may express their religious convictions in the public sphere, including state institutions, as long as this does not compromise institutional function or infringe on others' rights.
Closed Secularism: Religion is marginalized; public institutions are emptied of religious references, and religious expression is restricted in the public sphere.
Feature | Open Secularism | Closed Secularism |
|---|---|---|
State Neutrality | Affirmed | Affirmed |
Religious Expression | Allowed in public sphere | Restricted in public sphere |
Accommodation | Encouraged | Discouraged |
Goal | Pluralism and Inclusion | Uniformity and Control |
Example: Open secularism supports policies that accommodate religious diversity, while closed secularism seeks uniformity by restricting religious symbols and practices in public institutions.
Models of Secularism: Model A vs. Model B
Competing Views
Model A: Secularism is mainly concerned with controlling religion and defining its place in the public forum, often through restrictions.
Model B: Secularism aims to manage religious and philosophical diversity fairly, imposing limits on both religious and non-religious worldviews to ensure equality.
Example: Model B reflects Taylor's view that secularism should not privilege any worldview, religious or non-religious, and should foster peaceful coexistence among diverse groups.
Secularism and Human Rights in Liberal Democracy
Key Goals
Liberty: Freedom of belief and non-belief; protection of religious exercise.
Equality: No belief system—religious or secular—should be privileged by the state.
Fraternity: All belief communities should be included in shaping the political identity of society.
Example: Policies that ban religious symbols may conflict with the principles of liberty and equality, while policies that accommodate diversity promote fraternity and peaceful coexistence.
Application: Quebec’s Policy Debates
Contemporary Issues
Recent reports and legislation in Quebec reflect ongoing tensions between open and closed secularism.
Key questions include which approach is more consistent with human rights in a liberal democracy and how different segments of society perceive these policies.
Example: The 2025 Quebec Secularism Report recommends extending bans on religious symbols, raising debates about equality, inclusion, and the proper definition of secularism for the future.
Additional info: Charles Taylor’s work is foundational in contemporary philosophy of religion and political theory, especially regarding pluralism, identity, and the challenges of modernity. His book A Secular Age is a key text for understanding the evolution of secularism in Western societies.