Skip to main content
Back

Education as a Social Determinant of Health: Early Childhood Education and Care in Canada

Study Guide - Smart Notes

Tailored notes based on your materials, expanded with key definitions, examples, and context.

Education as a Social Determinant of Health

Introduction

Education is a key social determinant of health (SDH), influencing both individual and population health outcomes. Early childhood education and care (ECEC) is particularly critical, as it shapes cognitive, social, and emotional development, and sets the foundation for lifelong learning and well-being. In Canada, ECEC policy and access have evolved over time, reflecting broader social, economic, and political factors.

Early Child Development (ECD) and Social Determinants

Critical Factors Influencing ECD

  • Family Income: The most critical factor, shaped by employment, working conditions, and government benefits.

  • Other Determinants: Housing quality, food security, access to affordable child care and early education, and health/social services.

Developmental stages from pregnancy to early primary years

Additional info: Early childhood spans from prenatal development through the early primary years, with each stage presenting unique developmental needs and vulnerabilities.

Social Location & Equity in ECD

  • Access to ECD is shaped by class, gender, race, Indigenous ancestry, immigrant status, and disability status.

  • Inequities in these areas can limit opportunities for healthy development and educational attainment.

Components of nurturing care: good health, adequate nutrition, responsive caregiving, security and safety, opportunities for early learning

Additional info: Nurturing care is multidimensional, requiring coordinated support across health, nutrition, safety, and learning.

Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) in Canada

Historical Overview

  • ECEC in Canada developed as a fragmented patchwork, with 'education' and 'care' treated separately across provinces.

  • No national policy existed for decades, causing Canada to lag behind other OECD countries.

  • Federalism means education and social programs are provincial/territorial responsibilities, leading to variation in access and quality.

CBC article on daycare as a basic right in Denmark compared to Canada

Additional info: International comparisons highlight the potential for universal, rights-based approaches to child care.

Policy Evolution and Neoliberal Influence

  • "Open federalism" under Conservative governments led to decentralization and limited national ECEC policy (2006–2015).

  • The Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care (CWELCC) agreements (2021) marked a shift toward universal, publicly funded ECEC, with a $10/day goal.

Map of Canada with $10-a-day child care policy $10aDay.ca campaign logo

Integrated Approach to ECEC

OECD countries increasingly view 'care' and 'education' as inseparable, advocating for integrated, inclusive policies that serve all children and families, regardless of socioeconomic status.

Text excerpt on integrated ECEC policy from OECD

Benefits of Equitable ECEC Access

  • Strengthens foundations for lifelong learning.

  • Supports broad educational and social needs of families.

Text excerpt on policy makers recognizing the value of equitable ECEC access

Key Policy Lessons from International Comparisons

OECD Policy Lessons for ECEC

  • Systematic & Integrated Policy Development

  • Strong Partnership with Education System

  • Universal Access

  • Substantial Public Investment

  • Participatory Quality Improvement

  • Appropriate Training and Working Conditions for Staff

  • Systematic Monitoring & Data Collection

  • Stable Framework for Research and Evaluation

Canada has historically underinvested in ECEC, spending only 0.2% of GDP on childcare in 2006, the lowest among OECD countries.

Universal Access and Equity

  • Universal ECEC should be affordable, available, and equitably distributed.

  • Coverage for children aged 0–5 increased from 7.5% (1992) to 26.7% (2021).

  • Public funding improves access and equity compared to market-based systems.

Measuring Child Well-Being

Dimensions and Indicators

Child well-being is measured across multiple dimensions, including material well-being, health and safety, education, behaviours and risks, and housing/environment.

Dimension

Component

Indicator

Material well-being

Material deprivation

Relative child poverty rate, child deprivation rate

Health and safety

Preventive health services

Childhood mortality, immunization rate

Education

Participation, achievement

Preschool participation, PISA scores

Behaviours and risks

Health behaviours, risk behaviours

Eating habits, smoking, cannabis use

Housing and environment

Housing, environmental safety

Housing problems, exposure to violence

Table of child well-being indicators

International Rankings

Canada's ranking in child well-being has declined over time, reflecting challenges in material well-being, education, and health outcomes compared to other wealthy nations.

International comparison of child well-being rankings

Education as a Social Determinant of Health (SDH)

Direct and Indirect Impacts on Health

  • Direct: Education increases health literacy and promotes healthy behaviours.

  • Indirect: Education influences socioeconomic status (SES) and employment opportunities, which in turn affect health.

  • Education acts at individual, familial, and community levels.

Purposes of Education in a Democratic Society

  • Intellectual Development: Fosters critical thinking, problem-solving, and informed citizenship.

  • Social Development: Encourages collaboration, empathy, and civic responsibility.

  • Economic Development: Prepares individuals for the workforce, drives innovation, and supports economic stability.

Factors Affecting Educational Achievement

Types of Capital

  • Educational Capital: Family and community knowledge/resources, parental education, and support for learning.

  • Social Capital: Relationships, networks, and norms that support cooperation and engagement.

  • Economic Capital: Financial resources that affect access to educational tools and environments. SES is a strong predictor of academic performance.

  • Political Capital: Ability to influence educational policy and secure resources.

Intersectionality and privilege shape educational outcomes, with systemic inequalities affecting teacher quality, school resources, and opportunities.

Family Composition and Cultural Diversity

  • Family structure (e.g., lone-parent, stepfamilies) and cultural background influence educational support and outcomes.

  • Immigrant students in Canada often outperform non-immigrant peers, but language and integration challenges persist.

Schooling, Socialization, and Well-Being

Hidden Curriculum and Socialization

  • Schools socialize students into societal norms and values through the 'hidden curriculum.'

  • Teachers and peers play key roles in shaping identity and social expectations.

Teacher Quality and Peer Effects

  • High-quality teachers improve long-term educational and economic outcomes.

  • Peer relationships influence academic performance and sense of belonging.

Student Well-Being and Bullying

  • Chronic loneliness and bullying are linked to lower academic performance and mental health issues.

  • Cyberbullying is a growing concern, prompting policy responses focused on digital citizenship and mental health.

Challenges and Policy Directions

Current Challenges

  • Declining achievement in Canadian schools.

  • Recruitment and retention of skilled educators.

  • Persistent inequities in access and outcomes.

Policy Recommendations

  • Improve services and environments through community development and healthy public policy.

  • Invest in early childhood education to promote equity and long-term well-being.

Pearson Logo

Study Prep