Find the critical value(s) for the alternative hypothesis, level of significance , and sample sizes and . Assume that the samples are random and independent, the populations are normally distributed, and the population variances are (a) equal
Ha:μ1<μ2 , α=0.05 , n1=7 , n2=11

In each exercise,

d. decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, and

[APPLET] In Exercises 1–3, use the data, which list the hourly wages (in dollars) for randomly selected surgical technologists from three states. Assume the wages are normally distributed and that the samples are independent. (Adapted from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Maine: 22.76, 27.60, 25.08, 17.01, 30.15, 27.09, 20.95, 25.52, 20.11, 23.67, 24.32

Oklahoma: 24.64, 21.66, 19.38, 18.19, 23.14, 20.58, 19.53, 30.77, 27.46, 23.80

Massachusetts: 27.07, 24.71, 32.80, 28.34, 33.45, 33.36, 36.81, 30.04, 29.01, 24.30, 29.22, 29.50

Are the mean hourly wages of surgical technologists the same for all three states? Use α=0.01. Assume that the population variances are equal.

In each exercise,

e. interpret the decision in the context of the original claim.

[APPLET] In Exercises 1–3, use the data, which list the hourly wages (in dollars) for randomly selected surgical technologists from three states. Assume the wages are normally distributed and that the samples are independent. (Adapted from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Maine: 22.76, 27.60, 25.08, 17.01, 30.15, 27.09, 20.95, 25.52, 20.11, 23.67, 24.32

Oklahoma: 24.64, 21.66, 19.38, 18.19, 23.14, 20.58, 19.53, 30.77, 27.46, 23.80

Massachusetts: 27.07, 24.71, 32.80, 28.34, 33.45, 33.36, 36.81, 30.04, 29.01, 24.30, 29.22, 29.50

Are the mean hourly wages of surgical technologists the same for all three states? Use α=0.01. Assume that the population variances are equal.

For ${\bar{x}}_1=41,S_{x1}=8.3,n_1=40,{\bar{x}}_2=39,S_{x2}=5.8$, & $n_2=50$, perform a hypothesis test to test the claim that ${\mu }_1>{\mu }_2$, assuming ${\sigma }_1={\sigma }_2$ for $\alpha =0.01$.

Find the critical value(s) for the alternative hypothesis, level of significance , and sample sizes and . Assume that the samples are random and independent, the populations are normally distributed, and the population variances are (a) equal

Ha:μ1≠μ2 , α=0.10 , n1=11 , n2=14

Find the critical value(s) for the alternative hypothesis, level of significance , and sample sizes and . Assume that the samples are random and independent, the populations are normally distributed, and the population variances are (a) equal

Ha:μ1≠μ2 , α=0.01 , n1=19 , n2=22

Find the critical value(s) for the alternative hypothesis, level of significance , and sample sizes and . Assume that the samples are random and independent, the populations are normally distributed, and the population variances are (a) equal .

Ha:μ1<μ2 , α=0.10 , n1=30 , n2=32

Test the claim about the difference between two population means and at the level of significance α. Assume the samples are random and independent, and the populations are normally distributed.

Claim: μ1<μ2, α=0.10, Assume (σ1)^2=(σ2)^2

Sample statistics:

x̅1=0.345, s1=0.305 , n1=11 and x̅2=0.515, s2=0.215, n2=9

Yellowfin Tuna

A marine biologist claims that the mean fork length (see figure at the left) of yellowfin tuna is different in two zones in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. A sample of 26 yellowfin tuna collected in Zone A has a mean fork length of 76.2 centimeters and a standard deviation of 16.5 centimeters. A sample of 31 yellowfin tuna collected in Zone B has a mean fork length of 80.8 centimeters and a standard deviation of 23.4 centimeters. At ,α=0.01 can you support the marine biologist’s claim? Assume the population variances are equal. (Adapted from Fishery Bulletin)