A researcher is comparing mean cholesterol levels across 4 diet plans (A, B, C, D) in a One-Way ANOVA test. If was rejected and the researcher were to use a Bonferroni Test, how many pairs of comparisons would they do?
Table of contents
- 1. Intro to Stats and Collecting Data1h 14m
- 2. Describing Data with Tables and Graphs1h 56m
- 3. Describing Data Numerically2h 5m
- 4. Probability2h 17m
- 5. Binomial Distribution & Discrete Random Variables3h 6m
- 6. Normal Distribution and Continuous Random Variables2h 11m
- 7. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Mean3h 23m
- Sampling Distribution of the Sample Mean and Central Limit Theorem19m
- Distribution of Sample Mean - ExcelBonus23m
- Introduction to Confidence Intervals15m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Mean1h 18m
- Determining the Minimum Sample Size Required12m
- Finding Probabilities and T Critical Values - ExcelBonus28m
- Confidence Intervals for Population Means - ExcelBonus25m
- 8. Sampling Distributions & Confidence Intervals: Proportion2h 10m
- 9. Hypothesis Testing for One Sample5h 8m
- Steps in Hypothesis Testing1h 6m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Means1h 4m
- Hypothesis Testing: Means - ExcelBonus42m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Proportions37m
- Hypothesis Testing: Proportions - ExcelBonus27m
- Performing Hypothesis Tests: Variance12m
- Critical Values and Rejection Regions28m
- Link Between Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing12m
- Type I & Type II Errors16m
- 10. Hypothesis Testing for Two Samples5h 37m
- Two Proportions1h 13m
- Two Proportions Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus28m
- Two Means - Unknown, Unequal Variance1h 3m
- Two Means - Unknown Variances Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus12m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variance15m
- Two Means - Unknown, Equal Variances Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus9m
- Two Means - Known Variance12m
- Two Means - Sigma Known Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus21m
- Two Means - Matched Pairs (Dependent Samples)42m
- Matched Pairs Hypothesis Test - ExcelBonus12m
- Two Variances and F Distribution29m
- Two Variances - Graphing CalculatorBonus16m
- 11. Correlation1h 24m
- 12. Regression3h 33m
- Linear Regression & Least Squares Method26m
- Residuals12m
- Coefficient of Determination12m
- Regression Line Equation and Coefficient of Determination - ExcelBonus8m
- Finding Residuals and Creating Residual Plots - ExcelBonus11m
- Inferences for Slope31m
- Enabling Data Analysis ToolpakBonus1m
- Regression Readout of the Data Analysis Toolpak - ExcelBonus21m
- Prediction Intervals13m
- Prediction Intervals - ExcelBonus19m
- Multiple Regression - ExcelBonus29m
- Quadratic Regression15m
- Quadratic Regression - ExcelBonus10m
- 13. Chi-Square Tests & Goodness of Fit2h 21m
- 14. ANOVA2h 29m
14. ANOVA
Multiple Comparisons: Bonferoni Test
Problem 12.1.17
Textbook Question
Tukey Test A display of the Bonferroni test results from Table 12-1 (which is part of the Chapter Problem) is provided here. Shown on the top of the next page is the SPSS-generated display of results from the Tukey test using the same data. Compare the Tukey test results to those from the Bonferroni test.

Verified step by step guidance1
Step 1: Understand the purpose of the Tukey test and Bonferroni test. Both are post-hoc multiple comparison tests used after an ANOVA to determine which specific group means differ significantly from each other while controlling for Type I error.
Step 2: Examine the Tukey test results table. Identify the pairs of group sizes compared (Size 1 vs 2, 1 vs 3, etc.), the mean differences between these groups, the standard error of the differences, and the significance values (p-values).
Step 3: Note that the asterisk (*) next to the mean difference indicates a statistically significant difference at the 0.05 level. For example, Size 1 vs Size 2 has a mean difference of 109.250 with a p-value of 0.003, which is significant.
Step 4: Compare these Tukey test results to the Bonferroni test results from Table 12-1 (not shown here). Look for similarities and differences in which group comparisons are significant and the magnitude of mean differences and p-values.
Step 5: Conclude by discussing how both tests control for multiple comparisons but may differ slightly in sensitivity. Tukey's test is generally more powerful when comparing all pairs, while Bonferroni is more conservative. Highlight any pairs that are significant in one test but not the other.
Verified video answer for a similar problem:This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above
Video duration:
2mPlay a video:
0 Comments
Key Concepts
Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.
Multiple Comparison Tests
Multiple comparison tests are statistical procedures used after an ANOVA to determine which specific group means differ. They control the overall Type I error rate when making several pairwise comparisons. Examples include the Bonferroni and Tukey tests, each with different approaches to adjusting significance levels.
Recommended video:
Tukey Test
Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) Test
Tukey's HSD test compares all possible pairs of group means while controlling the family-wise error rate. It uses a studentized range distribution to determine critical values, making it more powerful than Bonferroni when comparing many groups. Significant mean differences are marked with an asterisk in SPSS output.
Recommended video:
Tukey Test
Interpretation of SPSS Output for Multiple Comparisons
SPSS output for multiple comparisons includes mean differences, standard errors, and significance values (p-values). A significant result (p < 0.05) indicates a statistically meaningful difference between group means. The output helps identify which specific pairs differ, guiding conclusions about group effects.
Recommended video:
Tukey Test
Related Videos
Related Practice
Multiple Choice
70
views
