Join thousands of students who trust us to help them ace their exams!Watch the first video
Multiple Choice
Why would it be problematic if the esophagus were lined with simple squamous epithelium instead of its normal epithelial type?
A
Simple squamous epithelium is too thin to protect against abrasion from food during swallowing.
B
Simple squamous epithelium would prevent nutrient absorption in the esophagus.
C
Simple squamous epithelium would increase mucus production, causing choking.
D
Simple squamous epithelium would make the esophagus rigid and unable to expand.
Verified step by step guidance
1
Understand the normal function of the esophagus: The esophagus is a muscular tube that transports food from the mouth to the stomach. It is lined with a specific type of epithelium that protects it from mechanical damage caused by food during swallowing.
Identify the normal epithelial type in the esophagus: The esophagus is typically lined with non-keratinized stratified squamous epithelium. This type of epithelium is multilayered, providing protection against abrasion from food particles.
Compare simple squamous epithelium to stratified squamous epithelium: Simple squamous epithelium is a single layer of flat cells, which is ideal for functions like diffusion and filtration (e.g., in the lungs or blood vessels). However, it lacks the thickness and durability needed to withstand mechanical stress.
Analyze the consequences of replacing stratified squamous epithelium with simple squamous epithelium: Simple squamous epithelium would be too thin to protect the esophagus from abrasion caused by food during swallowing. This could lead to damage, inflammation, or ulceration of the esophageal lining.
Evaluate the incorrect options: Simple squamous epithelium does not increase mucus production, prevent nutrient absorption (as the esophagus is not involved in absorption), or make the esophagus rigid. These are not valid consequences of this epithelial change.