Skip to main content
Pearson+ LogoPearson+ Logo
Ch. 32 Plant Nutrition and Transport
Taylor - Campbell Biology: Concepts & Connections 10th Edition
Taylor, Simon, Dickey, Hogan10th EditionCampbell Biology: Concepts & ConnectionsISBN: 9780136538783Not the one you use?Change textbook
Chapter 32, Problem 12

One of the most important properties of proper scientific investigations is their repeatability. Yet, as discussed in Module 32.11, studies that compare the nutritional content of conventional and organic produce sometimes produce contradictory results. Name some possible confounding factors that can account for such uneven results.

Verified step by step guidance
1
Understand the concept of confounding factors: These are variables that can influence the outcome of a study but are not the variables being directly studied. They can lead to misleading conclusions if not properly controlled.
Consider environmental factors: Differences in soil quality, climate, and farming practices (e.g., irrigation, crop rotation) can affect the nutritional content of both conventional and organic produce.
Account for genetic variation: Different varieties of the same crop may naturally have different nutritional profiles, regardless of whether they are grown conventionally or organically.
Examine post-harvest handling: Factors such as storage time, transportation conditions, and exposure to light or temperature can alter the nutritional content of produce before it is analyzed.
Evaluate study design and methodology: Variations in sample size, measurement techniques, and statistical analysis methods can lead to inconsistent results across studies.

Verified video answer for a similar problem:

This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above.
Video duration:
1m
Was this helpful?

Key Concepts

Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.

Repeatability in Scientific Investigations

Repeatability refers to the ability of an experiment or study to yield the same results when conducted under the same conditions. It is a fundamental principle of scientific research, ensuring that findings are reliable and not due to random chance. If results are not repeatable, it raises questions about the validity of the original study.
Recommended video:
Guided course
06:29
Scientific Method

Confounding Factors

Confounding factors are variables that can influence both the independent and dependent variables in a study, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. In the context of comparing nutritional content, factors such as soil quality, weather conditions, and farming practices can confound results, making it difficult to attribute differences solely to the type of produce (conventional vs. organic).
Recommended video:
Guided course
01:39
Density-Independent Factors

Nutritional Content Variability

Nutritional content variability refers to the differences in nutrient levels found in food products, which can be influenced by numerous factors including growing conditions, harvest time, and post-harvest handling. This variability can lead to inconsistent findings in studies comparing organic and conventional produce, as the nutritional profile may differ significantly even within the same category of produce.
Recommended video: