Join thousands of students who trust us to help them ace their exams!Watch the first video
Multiple Choice
Which of the following best explains why government-sanctioned activities to improve ecosystems have often had little effect?
A
Most ecosystems do not require any management or restoration.
B
Ecosystem improvement is only possible through natural disasters.
C
Government activities always focus on increasing biodiversity, which is not important.
D
Ecosystems are complex and may not respond predictably to human interventions.
Verified step by step guidance
1
Understand the complexity of ecosystems: Ecosystems are intricate networks of interactions between living organisms, their physical environment, and various processes such as nutrient cycling and energy flow. These interactions are dynamic and can be difficult to predict.
Recognize the unpredictability of human interventions: Human activities, even those intended to improve ecosystems, can have unintended consequences due to the interconnected nature of ecosystem components. For example, introducing a species to control pests might disrupt existing food webs.
Consider the limitations of government-sanctioned activities: While well-intentioned, these activities may not account for all variables in an ecosystem, such as species interactions, climate conditions, or long-term ecological changes.
Acknowledge the importance of adaptive management: Effective ecosystem restoration often requires ongoing monitoring and adjustments based on observed outcomes, rather than relying on a single intervention.
Conclude that ecosystems may not respond predictably: The correct answer highlights the inherent complexity of ecosystems and the challenges in predicting their responses to human interventions, emphasizing the need for careful planning and adaptive strategies.