Skip to main content
Ch. 7 - Logarithmic, Exponential Functions, and Hyperbolic Functions
Briggs - Calculus: Early Transcendentals 3rd Edition
Briggs3rd EditionCalculus: Early TranscendentalsISBN: 9780136847243Not the one you use?Change textbook
Chapter 7, Problem 7.1.67b

Explain why or why not Determine whether the following statements are true and give an explanation or counterexample. Assume x > 0 and y > 0.


b. ln 0 = 1

Verified step by step guidance
1
Recall the definition of the natural logarithm function: \(\ln x\) is the inverse of the exponential function \(e^x\), meaning \(\ln x = y\) if and only if \(e^y = x\).
Consider the value \(\ln 0\). To find this, we ask: for what value of \(y\) does \(e^y = 0\) hold true?
Since the exponential function \(e^y\) is always positive for all real numbers \(y\) (i.e., \(e^y > 0\) for all \(y\)), it never equals zero.
Therefore, there is no real number \(y\) such that \(e^y = 0\), which means \(\ln 0\) is undefined and does not equal 1 or any other real number.
In conclusion, the statement \(\ln 0 = 1\) is false because \(\ln 0\) is not defined in the real numbers.

Verified video answer for a similar problem:

This video solution was recommended by our tutors as helpful for the problem above.
Video duration:
1m
Was this helpful?

Key Concepts

Here are the essential concepts you must grasp in order to answer the question correctly.

Definition and Domain of the Natural Logarithm Function

The natural logarithm function, ln(x), is defined only for positive real numbers (x > 0). It represents the inverse of the exponential function e^x, meaning ln(x) answers the question: 'To what power must e be raised to get x?' Since 0 is not positive, ln(0) is undefined.
Recommended video:
05:18
Derivative of the Natural Logarithmic Function

Behavior of ln(x) as x Approaches Zero

As x approaches 0 from the positive side, ln(x) decreases without bound, tending toward negative infinity. This means ln(0) is not a finite number and certainly not equal to 1. Understanding this limit helps clarify why ln(0) is undefined.
Recommended video:
05:36
Integrals of Natural Exponential Functions (e^x) Example 3

Evaluating the Truth of Mathematical Statements

To determine if a statement like 'ln 0 = 1' is true, one must check the domain and properties of the functions involved. Since ln(0) is undefined, the statement is false. Providing a counterexample or referencing the function's domain is essential in justifying such claims.
Recommended video:
5:14
Evaluate Logarithms
Related Practice
Textbook Question

Oil consumption Starting in 2018 (t=0), the rate at which oil is consumed by a small country increases at a rate of 1.5%/yr, starting with an initial rate of 1.2 million barrels/yr.


b. Find the function that gives the amount of oil consumed between t=0 and any future time t.

51
views
Textbook Question

Properties of exp(x) Use the inverse relations between ln x and exp(x), and the properties of ln x, to prove the following properties:


b. exp(x − y) = exp(x) / exp(y)

83
views
Textbook Question

Theorem 7.8

Differentiate sinh⁻¹ x = ln (x + √(x² + 1)) to show that d/dx (sinh⁻¹ x) = 1 / √(x² + 1).

79
views
Textbook Question

61–62. Points of intersection and area

b. Compute the area of the region described.


f(x) = sinh x, g(x) = tanh x; the region bounded by the graphs of f, g, and x = ln 3

47
views
Textbook Question

A running model A model for the startup of a runner in a short race results in the velocity function v(t) = a(1 - e⁻ᵗ/ᶜ), where a and c are positive constants, t is measured in seconds, and v has units of m/s. (Source: Joe Keller, A Theory of Competitive Running, Physics Today, 26, Sep 1973)


b. Using the velocity in part (a) and assuming s(0) = 0, find the position function s(t), for t ≥ 0.

57
views
Textbook Question

A slowing race Starting at the same time and place, Abe and Bob race, running at velocities u(t) = 4 / (t + 1) mi/hr and v(t) = 4e^(−t/2) mi/hr, respectively, for t ≥ 0.

b. Find and graph the position functions of both runners. Which runner can run only a finite distance in an unlimited amount of time?

54
views